2

I’m seeking some theological and exegetical insight regarding the use of the word “appoint” in the New Testament passages about the establishment of elders (e.g. Acts 14:23; Titus 1:5).

In many English translations, appoint can sound like a top-down decision made by a few leaders. However, the Greek terms involved (such as χειροτονέω and καθίστημι) seem to carry a broader sense related to recognition, commissioning, or placing someone into a role, often within a communal or ecclesial context.

My question is this: Does the New Testament use of “appoint elders” necessarily imply a unilateral decision by church leaders, or does it presuppose some form of communal discernment, recognition, or confirmation by the local church?

I would appreciate perspectives from biblical studies, church history, or different ecclesiological traditions.

New contributor
han zhang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.

2 Answers 2

2

Appoint Elders

New Church Congregation
There is an incident in the book of Titus that dealt specifically with this dilemma:

The reason I left you in Crete was that you might straighten out what was left unfinished, and appoint elders in every town, as I directed you. (Titus 1:5)

It is apparent that when establishing a new local church (pioneer church) it was customary for an experienced minister to do the "appointing" (ordaining, NIV footnote). It is only reasonable, since all the congregation are New Believers, and not yet credible or qualified to be making decisions as Church elders, making decisions on their own.

In fact, the Apostle Paul listed right after his admonition to Titus, the qualifications that an aspiring Elder should have. (1:6-16) It would take some time to examine each man to see if he fit these qualifications. As an Overseer, Titus could discern who those were who could then qualify.

A list of these qualifications was also given in the book of 1 Timothy (3:1-7).

Established Church
However, in a local church that has been around for a period of time, it was more common for the presiding Elders to work together in appointing (ordaining) a new elder. This is mentioned in the case of Timothy's entrance into the ministry:

Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to preaching and to teaching. Do not neglect your gift, which was given you through a prophetic message when the Body of Elders laid their hands on you. (1 Timothy 4:13-14)

In modern terminology, this is called the laying on of hands by the Presbytery. And along with a prayer, there is usually an admonition and/or even a prophetic utterance with it! This prophetic Word gives direction as far as which type of ministry he is "gifted with."

Some elders are gifted with preaching; others with evangelism. Still others, with counseling, or social work, or teaching. Some are even anointed with the gift(s) of healing! (1 Corinthians 12-14)

Confirmation
Since the prospective elders are from the local church--and must meet the qualification of an elder--many churches require a confirmation of the Elders' choice by the local Congregation. The local people have "rubbed shoulders" with the man, and so they would know if he matches the qualifications of an Elder.

But the established Elders would be first in choosing the man because they have served as overseers, keeping watch over the people for some period of time.

To the saints in Christ Jesus...together with the Overseers, and deacons. Grace and peace to you... (Philippians 1:1)

Postscript
It is manifest in the New Testament church that there were appointed a plurality of elders. This is for several good reasons (1) planning with several inputs, (2) checks and balances, (3) a variety of available ministries, etc.

1

The answer as to who/how elder were 'appointed" is actually given/implied by the very verb used in Acts 14:23 and 2 Cor 8:19, which is, χειροτονέω (cheirotoneó). The other references to "appointing" do not say how this was done, but χειροτονέω (cheirotoneó) does because it means:

to choose by raising the hand and to vote - a term used by the senate when voting on either candidates or resolutions. See BDAG, Strong's and Thayer.

Thus, it appears that, at least in Acts 14:23 and 2 Cor 8:19 that elders were appointed by an election using a show of hands. These were possibly supervised by an apostle or someone the group was happy to do so, such as Titus or Timothy.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.